FCC fights "bill shock" - PhoneArena

In Q1 of 2010, the FCC received 5,130 inquiries, up 28% from Q1 of 2009. A study by the FCC also revealed that 30% of subscribers experience "bill shock." The FCC already has rules against cramming, which is when a carrier lumps in an extra charge with other fees like taxes etc. Even so, subscribers

Wireless subscribers are becoming increasingly wary of their bills. With incidents like Verizon's mistaken billing of $50 million, consumers are right to be mindful. But what can the FCC do about it?

In Q1 of 2010, the FCC received 5,130 inquiries, up 28% from Q1 of 2009. A study by the FCC also revealed that 30% of subscribers experience "bill shock."

The FCC already has rules against cramming, which is when a carrier lumps in an extra charge with other fees like taxes etc. Even so, subscribers are still receiving unwarranted charges. Many come from 3rd-party ringtone or other text-based services, which charge you again after your initial purchase. They can legally do this because their fine print allows them to trigger a subscription.

Amid the fraudulent charges, unfortunately, are the increasingly common charges for apps and other downloads; and the occasional data use if you don't have unlimited data. This makes it even harder for subscribers to recognize the fraudulent, or at least unintended, charges.

Senator Tom Udall [D-N.M.] has proposed that wireless carriers notify their customers, by text or email, when they have used 80% of their allowances. CTIA - The Wireless Association opposes any such legislation, saying that it "has the potential to cause customer confusion and frustration."

source: The Washington Post via textually

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7sbTOp5yaqpWjrm%2BvzqZmp52nqHyHj6JmnaKfmKnAbq7IpaNmq5iksKyryJ1obHBlaQ%3D%3D

 Share!